Photography Travelogues by Peter Eastway – Karijini National Park 2/3

Dales Gorge, But Not Sunset

Things are not always what they seem! The strong reds and oranges in the photograph of Dales Gorge in Karijini National Park, Western Australia are not from an early morning sunrise or a late sunset. Rather they are from sunlight reflected off red canyon walls.

Australia’s ‘Red Centre’ is at its reddest in Western Australia and there are few places I have visited that are as colourful as Karijini. As you walk down into the gorges, steep textured cliffs rise above you and if they catch direct sunlight, it is reflected strongly into the water pools and cascades below.

It might seem like a relatively straightforward matter to walk along the base of the gorge, looking for reflections – and to a certain extent it is. But those reflections don’t stay in the one place for long and so you can find yourself constantly moving your camera angle to retain the light and the colour. For images like this, mid morning and mid afternoon are usually the best times because this is when the sun is strongest on the gorge walls, but the gorge itself is still in shadow. The dim surroundings contrast wonderfully with the rich colours reflected from the cliffs up high.

This image is taken with a mid-telephoto lens, ideal for the angle I wanted, but challenging in terms of depth-of-field. To make the most of the location, I wanted sharp focus all the way from the bottom of the frame up to the top. A small aperture (like f22) almost gave me what I wanted, but as you stop down a lens (use a smaller aperture), diffraction increases. Diffraction reduces image clarity and occurs when light is forced through a small aperture, so while a smaller aperture is increasing image quality with more depth-of-field, at the same time you’re losing image clarity through diffraction.

My solution is to use a wider aperture – such as f8 or f11 – and shoot a series of images, each focused at slightly different points.

This series is then ‘stacked’ together. A popular program for ‘focus stacking’ is called Helicon Focus (www.heliconsoft.com) and while originally designed for scientific applications, it can work wonders for landscape photography as well.

To get the best results from focus stacking, you need to ensure your camera is locked off on a sturdy tripod. Although the light was changing quickly, I forced myself to slow down and ensure I had a good camera angle. I use an Arca Swiss Cube head on my tripod and it allows very precise positioning and once set, the camera won’t move. With the camera ready, I switched to manual focus and took a series of six images with different focus settings, beginning close to the camera and extending out to infinity. It’s a good idea to use manual exposure mode as well to ensure the exposures are consistent.

In Capture One Pro, turning on the Focus Mask quickly shows you where each image is correctly focused, the green ‘mask’ covering the areas of critical focus. If you’ve focused accurately, you can determine which frame gives you best focus in the foreground, and then follow the exposures through until you find the one with the best focus in the background.

Once I had selected the five files I needed, I refined the exposure, colour and tonal settings on the first frame. Then I copied up these adjustments (using the upward sloping arrow icon) and applied them to the other four images (using the downward sloping arrow icon). The images were then output – I produced full size 16-bit TIF files.

With my five files processed, I then opened Helicon Focus, selected the files and further processed them into a single file where the small curve of rock in the bottom left of the frame is just as crisp and sharp as the small cascade in the middle up the top of the frame.

The result is an image with more clarity and sharpness than a single frame taken at f22, both in terms of the extent of focus, and the lack of any diffraction.

To see more of Peter Eastway’s photography techniques, including his Landscape Photography MasterClass, please visit
http://www.betterphotography.com/
.

8 Responses to Photography Travelogues by Peter Eastway – Karijini National Park 2/3

  1. Andy Wainwright says:

    Wow…posting “untagged RGB” files…
    This is incorrect and unprofessional…

    An “Untagged RGB” isn’t just another color space, indeed, it’s the lack of one. !
    A file that isn’t tagged as being in any specific color space still has red, green and blue values for
    each pixel of course, it’s just that a program reading it doesn’t have any way to know what those
    numbers mean. When “Untagged”, an image can be ʻcoldʼ, ʻpaleʼ, ʻunsaturatedʼ…and certainly not
    what the author intended.
    sRGB is arguably the current target RGB Color Space for internet publishing because the world wide
    web is not color managed. sRGB (standard Red Green Blue) is a generic monitor-type profile that
    tells “average” 2.2 gamma monitors how to display color.

  2. Hi says:

    Andy is a dick

  3. Clearly, color space was not the point of the blog post. I found the post useful, but still have questions about the usefulness of focus stacking with a moving subject – in my experience, Helicon Focus has a tough time with moving water, flowers blowing in a breeze, etc. I’d like to see a tutorial on how to mask and blend the stacked exposures to eliminate the ghosting that occurs when something has moved in the image.

  4. Duarte Bruno says:

    I’m not here to promote PhotoAcute but the reality is that is has a radiometric alignment algorithm that surpasses anything I’ve seen from traditional HDR tools like PhotoMatix or even PhotoShop. If allow it to morph on alignment, it deals gracefully with wind shaking trees, and does a lot of stacking tricks like SuperResolution, Noise Reduction, Moving Object Removal and Focus Stacking.
    Where it doesn’t do it’s best is with soft and difficult to identify moving objects: fast moving clouds and surf usually present a lot of challenges. That’s where a camera with a very fast capture frame rate should come to the rescue!

  5. Simply great photos – but what else would I expect given the photographer!

  6. Peter Smith says:

    HI Pete,

    Love the shot Pete and thanks for taking the time to go throught the work flow, greatly appreciated. How much better (if any) do you think Helicon Focus is for focus stacking than photoshop. i.e. is it worth the money, can you tell the difference in bigger (60×45″) prints.

    Looking forward to some more locations, have fun and be safe.

    Kind Regards, Peter

    • Peter Eastway says:

      Hi Peter,

      I haven’t done focus stacking with Photoshop, except in a very elementary way. I also acknowledge that Helicon Focus has some limitations and it is not suitable for all subjects, so understanding the hyperfocal focusing distance and depth-of-field remains an important skill to have for image capture.

      Cheers, Peter Eastway

  7. David says:

    Peter,

    I’m sorry, but I find your images far too lurid and derivative of the US Southwest school of landscape photography, as exemplified by the Muench dynasty. The emphasis you place on these super saturated colours detracts from anything you might be saying about the composition. Just because it is possible to achieve such an eye-catching palette doesn’t mean that you should. I imagine that your work is commercially very successful, but don’t forget the power of using muted hues to evoke a sense of mystery and presence.

    David

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 786 other followers

%d bloggers like this: